Tulare County, CA Cell Phone Coverage Map & Network Rankings (2026)

Find the best cell phone network and plan to use in Tulare County, CA

Coverage rankings for Tulare County, CA

T-Mobile currently ranks first for coverage in this area, with a coverage score of 50.1. Compare Wireless Carriers uses FCC broadband map data to estimate and calculate coverage scores. More on that further below.

RankCarrierScoreOverall4G LTE5GFast 5GAverage Signal
1T-Mobile50.141.7%41.2%40.1%33.8% -88 dBm
2Verizon45.247.5%47.4%31.1%19.7% -95 dBm
3AT&T41.345.5%45.2%36.4%20.4% -111 dBm

Scores include coverage area, network type, and average signal strength.

Cell phone coverage map for Tulare County, CA

Zoom in for local detail. Tap or click a colored area to see coverage and signal details. On mobile, use two fingers to move the map.

Coverage Key
Less covered More covered
Darker areas mean the carrier covers more of that location.

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, © CARTO. Rendered with MapLibre. FCC BDC mobile coverage processed by Compare Wireless Carriers.

Loading coverage map...

Cell phone coverage by network in Tulare County, CA

#1

T-Mobile

Coverage Score 50.1
In Tulare County, CA
Overall
41.7%
4G LTE
41.2%
5G
40.1%
Fast 5G
33.8%
Average Signal -88 dBm
#2

Verizon

Coverage Score 45.2
In Tulare County, CA
Overall
47.5%
4G LTE
47.4%
5G
31.1%
Fast 5G
19.7%
Average Signal -95 dBm
#3

AT&T

Coverage Score 41.3
In Tulare County, CA
Overall
45.5%
4G LTE
45.2%
5G
36.4%
Fast 5G
20.4%
Average Signal -111 dBm
Sponsored US Mobile

Coverage varies by neighborhood. Your carrier shouldn’t.

US Mobile lets you switch between all three major networks, so you can choose the one that works best where you actually use your phone.

Choose your network
Dark Star Light Speed Warp 5G
Unlimited plans from
$22.50/mo
Phone + home internet bundle from
$47/mo
Shop US Mobile

Pricing, network access, switching terms, and home internet availability may vary.

Coverage by city in Tulare County, CA

Cities and towns are shown for county-level comparison. Coverage percentages use land-area only coverage.

CityVerizonAT&TT-Mobile
Allensworth, CA 100.0% 100.0% 76.1% 0.0% -99 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -93 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -82 dBm
Alpaugh, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -67 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 70.0% -106 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -79 dBm
Badger, CA 62.2% 61.7% 21.3% 18.3% -98 dBm 40.8% 40.7% 28.1% 17.5% -114 dBm 34.5% 34.1% 33.5% 24.3% -90 dBm
California Hot Springs, CA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.3% 5.3% 0.0% 0.0% -120 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Camp Nelson, CA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Cedar Slope, CA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Cutler, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 92.9% -81 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 53.6% -95 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -77 dBm
Delft Colony, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% -90 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -100 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -85 dBm
Dinuba, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 83.8% -83 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 92.9% -94 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -80 dBm
Ducor, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 85.7% -91 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -120 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -66 dBm
Earlimart, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -80 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 89.1% -96 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -79 dBm
East Orosi, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -90 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% -110 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -90 dBm
East Porterville, CA 100.0% 100.0% 97.9% 95.7% -81 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 93.6% -96 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -72 dBm
East Tulare Villa, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -82 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 80.0% 0.0% -110 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -88 dBm
El Monte Mobile Village, CA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
El Rancho, CA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Exeter, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -79 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 89.1% -90 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -75 dBm
Farmersville, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -78 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 79.2% -96 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -76 dBm
Goshen, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 92.8% -85 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 68.1% -106 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -87 dBm
Hartland, CA 75.0% 75.0% 50.0% 50.0% -107 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% -90 dBm
Hypericum, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -70 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% -110 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -90 dBm
Idlewild, CA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 75.0% 75.0% 0.0% 0.0% -113 dBm 75.0% 75.0% 58.3% 41.7% -92 dBm
Ivanhoe, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -72 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.8% -90 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -71 dBm
Jovista, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% -100 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -110 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -90 dBm
Kennedy Meadows, CA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Kings Canyon National Pk, CA 87.2% 87.2% 54.1% 39.4% -96 dBm 12.8% 12.8% 1.8% 0.0% -119 dBm 18.3% 16.5% 18.3% 13.8% -92 dBm
Lemon Cove, CA 100.0% 100.0% 71.4% 0.0% -100 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 60.7% 42.9% -115 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 89.3% -89 dBm
Lindcove, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% -100 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -95 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -85 dBm
Lindsay, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 90.6% -87 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 67.2% -96 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -71 dBm
Linnell Camp, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -80 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -85 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -85 dBm
London, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 76.2% -93 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 33.3% -110 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -63 dBm
Matheny, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -88 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 44.4% -100 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -90 dBm
McClenney Tract, CA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 91.7% 91.7% 0.0% 0.0% -117 dBm 83.3% 83.3% 66.7% 50.0% -94 dBm
Monson, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -92 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% -110 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -90 dBm
Orosi, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.4% -90 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 90.3% -97 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -70 dBm
Panorama Heights, CA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 87.5% 87.5% 0.0% 0.0% -120 dBm 50.0% 50.0% 37.5% 37.5% -93 dBm
Patterson Tract, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 90.6% -91 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 71.9% -102 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -86 dBm
Pierpoint, CA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 9.1% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0% -120 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Pine Flat, CA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 22.7% 22.7% 0.0% 0.0% -120 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Pixley, CA 100.0% 100.0% 99.1% 87.1% -86 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 81.9% -98 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -76 dBm
Plainview, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -90 dBm 80.0% 40.0% 60.0% 0.0% -115 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -90 dBm
Ponderosa, CA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Poplar-Cotton Center, CA 100.0% 100.0% 96.5% 87.7% -92 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 59.6% -100 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -73 dBm
Porterville, CA 100.0% 100.0% 98.3% 77.9% -86 dBm 98.3% 98.3% 96.7% 61.9% -100 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.5% -79 dBm
Posey, CA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 88.9% 88.9% 0.0% 0.0% -115 dBm 44.4% 44.4% 22.2% 11.1% -98 dBm
Poso Park, CA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Richgrove, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -80 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -98 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -65 dBm
Rodriguez Camp, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -90 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -110 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -80 dBm
Sequoia Crest, CA 32.0% 32.0% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm 56.0% 56.0% 0.0% 0.0% -120 dBm 8.0% 0.0% 8.0% 0.0% -100 dBm
Sequoia National Park, CA 26.2% 26.1% 3.8% 1.9% -105 dBm 11.3% 11.3% 1.2% 0.1% -120 dBm 8.6% 8.5% 8.1% 4.6% -96 dBm

About The Coverage Data

Coverage and signal estimates are derived by Compare Wireless Carriers from carrier-reported data in the FCC’s National Broadband Coverage Map, last updated in June 2025. “Percent covered” shows how much of the city or ZIP code area has a carrier signal, whether weak or strong. Signal bars show the estimated average signal strength in areas of Tulare County, CA where that carrier has coverage.

If a carrier says you should have service but you do not, run a challenge test with the FCC Mobile Speed Test App. The FCC uses those results to check carrier-submitted coverage data and requires a carrier response when enough tests show a pattern of inaccurate coverage reporting.