Coverage rankings for Salem County, NJ
AT&T currently ranks first for coverage in this area, with a coverage score of 82.6. Compare Wireless Carriers uses FCC broadband map data to estimate and calculate coverage scores. More on that further below.
| Rank | Carrier | Score | Overall | 4G LTE | 5G | Fast 5G | Average Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AT&T | 82.6 | 99.5% | 99.5% | 78.6% | 60.2% | -114 dBm |
| 2 | T-Mobile | 80.9 | 82.3% | 82.2% | 76.7% | 59.2% | -89 dBm |
| 3 | Verizon | 74.6 | 99.1% | 99.1% | 47.5% | 31.1% | -97 dBm |
Scores include coverage area, network type, and average signal strength.
Cell phone coverage map for Salem County, NJ
Zoom in for local detail. Tap or click a colored area to see coverage and signal details. On mobile, use two fingers to move the map.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, © CARTO. Rendered with MapLibre. FCC BDC mobile coverage processed by Compare Wireless Carriers.
Loading coverage map...
Cell phone coverage by network in Salem County, NJ
AT&T
- Overall
- 99.5%
- 4G LTE
- 99.5%
- 5G
- 78.6%
- Fast 5G
- 60.2%
T-Mobile
- Overall
- 82.3%
- 4G LTE
- 82.2%
- 5G
- 76.7%
- Fast 5G
- 59.2%
Verizon
- Overall
- 99.1%
- 4G LTE
- 99.1%
- 5G
- 47.5%
- Fast 5G
- 31.1%
Coverage varies by neighborhood. Your carrier shouldn’t.
US Mobile lets you switch between all three major networks, so you can choose the one that works best where you actually use your phone.
Pricing, network access, switching terms, and home internet availability may vary.
Coverage by city in Salem County, NJ
Cities and towns are shown for county-level comparison. Coverage percentages use land-area only coverage.
| City | Verizon | AT&T | T-Mobile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alloway, NJ | 98.8% 98.8% 0.0% 0.0% -99 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 98.8% 91.1% -113 dBm | 57.1% 57.1% 49.4% 26.8% -97 dBm |
| Auburn, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 88.1% 67.9% -99 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 72.5% -110 dBm | 99.1% 99.1% 98.2% 86.2% -86 dBm |
| Carneys Point, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 98.6% 77.8% -96 dBm | 98.6% 98.6% 67.6% 59.4% -109 dBm | 99.0% 99.0% 72.0% 54.1% -88 dBm |
| Deepwater, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -96 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 76.2% 23.8% -115 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 90.5% 66.7% -93 dBm |
| Elmer, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 8.7% 4.3% -90 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -103 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 87.0% -93 dBm |
| Elsinboro, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 58.0% 31.7% -100 dBm | 99.7% 99.7% 80.0% 15.0% -119 dBm | 95.0% 95.0% 88.7% 59.3% -95 dBm |
| Hancocks Bridge, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -103 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 66.7% -120 dBm | 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 0.0% -100 dBm |
| Lower Alloways Creek, NJ | 95.0% 95.0% 8.6% 0.2% -101 dBm | 98.0% 98.0% 39.8% 21.2% -118 dBm | 58.2% 58.1% 55.8% 34.8% -97 dBm |
| Mannington, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 62.1% 37.0% -98 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 79.4% 62.1% -115 dBm | 91.9% 91.9% 88.0% 75.7% -87 dBm |
| Oldmans, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 98.0% 93.1% -93 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 99.2% 79.4% -106 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 99.2% 88.8% -85 dBm |
| Olivet, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 23.8% 6.3% -98 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -112 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 96.8% 81.0% -86 dBm |
| Pedricktown, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -92 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 88.4% -108 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -83 dBm |
| Penns Grove, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 82.6% -99 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 87.0% -113 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -90 dBm |
| Pennsville, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 82.9% 66.5% -94 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 77.1% 55.3% -112 dBm | 93.8% 93.8% 88.7% 64.0% -91 dBm |
| Pilesgrove, NJ | 99.9% 99.9% 60.7% 33.6% -97 dBm | 99.9% 99.9% 96.7% 78.4% -109 dBm | 92.6% 92.3% 89.8% 76.1% -85 dBm |
| Pittsgrove, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 38.1% 18.4% -99 dBm | 98.6% 98.6% 74.2% 55.9% -117 dBm | 74.9% 74.9% 62.8% 34.6% -96 dBm |
| Quinton, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -79 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 65.2% -117 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 78.3% -90 dBm |
| Salem, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 94.4% 79.6% -91 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 72.2% 64.8% -116 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.3% -80 dBm |
| Upper Pittsgrove, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 52.1% 36.2% -93 dBm | 99.9% 99.9% 85.5% 73.2% -114 dBm | 92.9% 92.9% 89.0% 77.2% -86 dBm |
| Woodstown, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 59.0% 35.9% -92 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -93 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -69 dBm |
| Deerfield, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 51.1% 41.8% -93 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 94.1% 78.3% -115 dBm | 91.0% 91.0% 80.6% 48.7% -93 dBm |
| Elk, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 86.2% 61.2% -97 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 87.4% 74.8% -112 dBm | 95.4% 95.4% 89.9% 71.3% -88 dBm |
| Harrisonville, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 78.8% 25.0% -104 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 90.4% 86.5% -118 dBm | 88.5% 88.5% 78.8% 63.5% -90 dBm |
| Logan, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 94.1% 82.1% -93 dBm | 99.5% 99.5% 93.8% 68.5% -111 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.0% -83 dBm |
| Malaga, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 92.5% -90 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 75.5% 75.5% -116 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -80 dBm |
| Marlboro, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 20.0% 10.0% -98 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 90.0% -111 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 90.0% 40.0% -96 dBm |
| Rosenhayn, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 69.6% 50.7% -97 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 82.6% -114 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 94.2% -83 dBm |
| South Harrison, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 88.9% 67.4% -98 dBm | 98.7% 98.7% 73.2% 48.0% -118 dBm | 89.4% 89.4% 82.1% 56.8% -90 dBm |
| Stow Creek, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 14.3% 12.1% -91 dBm | 80.2% 80.2% 47.0% 42.0% -116 dBm | 52.7% 52.7% 42.4% 27.0% -94 dBm |
| Upper Deerfield, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 47.8% 36.6% -89 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 93.1% 74.8% -111 dBm | 89.5% 89.5% 82.5% 60.2% -89 dBm |
| Vineland, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 73.8% 58.2% -89 dBm | 99.9% 99.9% 74.3% 60.7% -109 dBm | 96.4% 96.4% 92.8% 76.7% -87 dBm |
| Woolwich, NJ | 100.0% 100.0% 93.5% 72.3% -96 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 98.7% 84.9% -106 dBm | 99.4% 99.4% 98.9% 90.8% -84 dBm |
About The Coverage Data
Coverage and signal estimates are derived by Compare Wireless Carriers from carrier-reported data in the FCC’s National Broadband Coverage Map, last updated in June 2025. “Percent covered” shows how much of the city or ZIP code area has a carrier signal, whether weak or strong. Signal bars show the estimated average signal strength in areas of Salem County, NJ where that carrier has coverage.
If a carrier says you should have service but you do not, run a challenge test with the FCC Mobile Speed Test App. The FCC uses those results to check carrier-submitted coverage data and requires a carrier response when enough tests show a pattern of inaccurate coverage reporting.