Coverage rankings for McKinley County, NM
AT&T currently ranks first for coverage in this area, with a coverage score of 49.1. Compare Wireless Carriers uses FCC broadband map data to estimate and calculate coverage scores. More on that further below.
| Rank | Carrier | Score | Overall | 4G LTE | 5G | Fast 5G | Average Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AT&T | 49.1 | 72.4% | 72.4% | 22.9% | 16.5% | -113 dBm |
| 2 | Verizon | 35.3 | 49.6% | 49.4% | 8.6% | 4.4% | -102 dBm |
| 3 | T-Mobile | 34.3 | 29.7% | 27.8% | 26.1% | 14.3% | -95 dBm |
Scores include coverage area, network type, and average signal strength.
Cell phone coverage map for McKinley County, NM
Zoom in for local detail. Tap or click a colored area to see coverage and signal details. On mobile, use two fingers to move the map.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, © CARTO. Rendered with MapLibre. FCC BDC mobile coverage processed by Compare Wireless Carriers.
Loading coverage map...
Cell phone coverage by network in McKinley County, NM
AT&T
- Overall
- 72.4%
- 4G LTE
- 72.4%
- 5G
- 22.9%
- Fast 5G
- 16.5%
Verizon
- Overall
- 49.6%
- 4G LTE
- 49.4%
- 5G
- 8.6%
- Fast 5G
- 4.4%
T-Mobile
- Overall
- 29.7%
- 4G LTE
- 27.8%
- 5G
- 26.1%
- Fast 5G
- 14.3%
Coverage varies by neighborhood. Your carrier shouldn’t.
US Mobile lets you switch between all three major networks, so you can choose the one that works best where you actually use your phone.
Pricing, network access, switching terms, and home internet availability may vary.
Coverage by city in McKinley County, NM
Cities and towns are shown for county-level comparison. Coverage percentages use land-area only coverage.
| City | Verizon | AT&T | T-Mobile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Becenti, NM | 89.5% 89.5% 0.0% 0.0% -108 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 42.1% 42.1% -101 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Black Hat, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -69 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 31.8% 27.3% -94 dBm | 72.7% 68.2% 59.1% 4.5% -99 dBm |
| Black Rock, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 82.4% 70.6% -92 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -85 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.1% -84 dBm |
| Bluewater, NM | 97.0% 97.0% 14.3% 10.2% -102 dBm | 44.5% 44.5% 21.5% 19.6% -120 dBm | 49.4% 49.4% 23.8% 0.8% -105 dBm |
| Borrego Pass, NM | 50.7% 50.7% 0.0% 0.0% -106 dBm | 22.2% 22.2% 0.0% 0.0% -120 dBm | 10.9% 10.9% 3.5% 0.0% -106 dBm |
| Brimhall, NM | 65.4% 65.4% 0.0% 0.0% -109 dBm | 88.1% 88.1% 65.5% 43.2% -116 dBm | 35.0% 29.3% 33.4% 8.5% -99 dBm |
| Brimhall Nizhoni, NM | 89.0% 89.0% 0.0% 0.0% -109 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 94.6% 38.5% -114 dBm | 74.5% 70.8% 68.0% 8.5% -101 dBm |
| Catalpa Canyon, NM | 98.7% 98.7% 80.0% 71.0% -86 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 94.2% 60.0% -105 dBm | 100.0% 96.1% 100.0% 87.7% -89 dBm |
| Church Rock, NM | 90.2% 90.2% 22.4% 18.8% -98 dBm | 97.7% 97.5% 51.3% 38.9% -114 dBm | 91.5% 87.4% 88.4% 74.1% -89 dBm |
| Continental Divide, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 17.5% 7.0% -92 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.2% -109 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -86 dBm |
| Crestview, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 90.0% 60.0% -86 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 66.7% -107 dBm | 100.0% 96.7% 100.0% 100.0% -78 dBm |
| Crownpoint, NM | 91.5% 91.5% 0.0% 0.0% -95 dBm | 99.2% 99.2% 80.6% 77.4% -111 dBm | 0.4% 0.4% 0.3% 0.0% -102 dBm |
| Fort Wingate, NM | 80.5% 80.5% 0.0% 0.0% -109 dBm | 87.8% 87.8% 53.7% 48.8% -120 dBm | 36.6% 26.8% 36.6% 24.4% -97 dBm |
| Gallup, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 91.9% 84.2% -85 dBm | 99.3% 99.3% 97.9% 57.9% -103 dBm | 100.0% 99.5% 100.0% 99.3% -79 dBm |
| Gamerco, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 85.0% 65.0% -92 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 25.0% -102 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -79 dBm |
| Haystack, NM | 80.2% 80.2% 8.8% 7.7% -98 dBm | 74.7% 74.7% 20.9% 2.2% -118 dBm | 49.5% 49.5% 38.5% 8.8% -101 dBm |
| Homer C Jones, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 80.0% 80.0% -84 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A | 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 20.0% -95 dBm |
| Iyanbito, NM | 98.0% 98.0% 9.8% 0.0% -95 dBm | 96.6% 96.1% 90.7% 44.1% -113 dBm | 98.5% 98.5% 98.5% 96.1% -87 dBm |
| Jamestown, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -81 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 84.2% -104 dBm | 98.2% 96.5% 98.2% 96.5% -79 dBm |
| Manuelito, NM | 98.3% 98.3% 0.0% 0.0% -84 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 4.0% 2.8% -94 dBm | 99.4% 99.4% 88.1% 86.4% -80 dBm |
| McGaffey, NM | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A | 5.3% 5.3% 5.3% 5.3% -120 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Mentmore, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 86.4% 76.2% -87 dBm | 99.8% 99.8% 98.8% 55.5% -105 dBm | 99.5% 97.0% 99.5% 96.6% -81 dBm |
| Mexican Springs, NM | 42.6% 42.6% 0.0% 0.0% -108 dBm | 74.0% 74.0% 34.3% 14.9% -119 dBm | 37.1% 31.3% 33.1% 6.0% -101 dBm |
| Nakaibito, NM | 76.9% 76.9% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 81.6% 57.8% -118 dBm | 88.4% 83.7% 86.4% 32.7% -100 dBm |
| Navajo, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -71 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -85 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Ojo Encino, NM | 84.6% 76.9% 69.2% 0.0% -113 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -88 dBm | 69.2% 69.2% 69.2% 0.0% -100 dBm |
| Pinedale, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -89 dBm | 99.5% 99.5% 24.9% 22.1% -111 dBm | 49.3% 42.9% 43.8% 9.2% -101 dBm |
| Pinehaven, NM | 42.8% 42.8% 0.0% 0.0% -109 dBm | 98.7% 98.7% 0.0% 0.0% -104 dBm | 27.0% 25.7% 16.4% 0.0% -102 dBm |
| Prewitt, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 88.3% 76.8% -93 dBm | 96.0% 96.0% 76.2% 76.2% -115 dBm | 93.3% 93.3% 90.6% 55.7% -96 dBm |
| Pueblo Pintado, NM | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A | 99.7% 99.7% 0.0% 0.0% -98 dBm | 4.2% 4.2% 1.9% 0.0% -105 dBm |
| Purty Rock, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 46.2% -87 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 84.6% 57.7% -107 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -82 dBm |
| Ramah, NM | 33.6% 33.6% 0.0% 0.0% -105 dBm | 97.7% 97.7% 0.0% 0.0% -97 dBm | 21.0% 21.0% 17.6% 1.5% -101 dBm |
| Red Rock Ranch, NM | 87.5% 87.5% 49.0% 9.6% -103 dBm | 56.7% 56.7% 49.0% 17.3% -118 dBm | 77.9% 77.9% 70.2% 27.9% -100 dBm |
| Rehoboth, NM | 83.4% 83.4% 28.0% 19.4% -101 dBm | 93.6% 93.6% 67.0% 16.1% -117 dBm | 90.6% 86.4% 82.8% 55.7% -92 dBm |
| Rock Springs, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 65.2% 55.1% -94 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 88.8% 61.0% -117 dBm | 95.9% 88.4% 95.1% 61.8% -96 dBm |
| Sagar, NM | 37.5% 37.5% 0.0% 0.0% -107 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -81 dBm | 10.0% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% -103 dBm |
| Sundance, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 69.2% 66.7% -89 dBm | 98.7% 98.7% 79.5% 41.0% -115 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 93.6% -78 dBm |
| Thoreau, NM | 93.5% 93.4% 74.1% 67.6% -90 dBm | 87.5% 87.5% 77.8% 68.9% -106 dBm | 87.9% 87.6% 86.9% 76.8% -83 dBm |
| Timberlake, NM | 40.1% 40.1% 0.0% 0.0% -104 dBm | 52.6% 52.6% 0.0% 0.0% -117 dBm | 1.5% 1.5% 1.2% 0.0% -100 dBm |
| Tohatchi, NM | 29.3% 29.3% 0.0% 0.0% -105 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 99.3% 92.9% -99 dBm | 72.9% 70.7% 64.3% 0.0% -101 dBm |
| Tse Bonito, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -96 dBm | 98.0% 98.0% 2.0% 2.0% -110 dBm | 14.9% 8.1% 8.1% 0.7% -103 dBm |
| Twin Lakes, NM | 96.4% 96.4% 1.5% 1.5% -100 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 91.2% 79.9% -113 dBm | 91.8% 88.7% 91.8% 86.6% -91 dBm |
| Vanderwagen, NM | 19.5% 19.5% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -92 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| White Cliffs, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -83 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 66.7% -104 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -80 dBm |
| Williams Acres, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -68 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -95 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -64 dBm |
| Yah-ta-hey, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 94.7% 88.0% -78 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 98.7% 86.7% -118 dBm | 98.7% 97.3% 98.7% 80.0% -93 dBm |
| Yatahey, NM | 85.7% 85.7% 21.3% 14.2% -99 dBm | 96.7% 96.6% 76.0% 53.9% -114 dBm | 82.7% 73.2% 80.9% 56.6% -94 dBm |
| Zuni, NM | 52.8% 52.4% 17.0% 10.5% -101 dBm | 64.1% 64.1% 0.0% 0.0% -112 dBm | 45.4% 45.3% 39.3% 23.7% -94 dBm |
| Zuni Pueblo, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 53.6% 2.9% -96 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -93 dBm | 99.3% 99.3% 98.6% 92.8% -91 dBm |
| Bluewater Village, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 79.6% 69.1% -90 dBm | 99.4% 99.4% 50.0% 47.5% -111 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.8% -78 dBm |
About The Coverage Data
Coverage and signal estimates are derived by Compare Wireless Carriers from carrier-reported data in the FCC’s National Broadband Coverage Map, last updated in June 2025. “Percent covered” shows how much of the city or ZIP code area has a carrier signal, whether weak or strong. Signal bars show the estimated average signal strength in areas of McKinley County, NM where that carrier has coverage.
If a carrier says you should have service but you do not, run a challenge test with the FCC Mobile Speed Test App. The FCC uses those results to check carrier-submitted coverage data and requires a carrier response when enough tests show a pattern of inaccurate coverage reporting.