Clinton County, IN Cell Phone Coverage Map & Network Rankings (2026)

Find the best cell phone network and plan to use in Clinton County, IN

Coverage rankings for Clinton County, IN

T-Mobile currently ranks first for coverage in this area, with a coverage score of 86.4. Compare Wireless Carriers uses FCC broadband map data to estimate and calculate coverage scores. More on that further below.

RankCarrierScoreOverall4G LTE5GFast 5GAverage Signal
1T-Mobile86.494.7%94.6%84.1%57.6% -92 dBm
2AT&T86.199.9%99.9%95.7%63.0% -111 dBm
3Verizon65.099.5%99.5%27.0%12.9% -98 dBm

Scores include coverage area, network type, and average signal strength.

Cell phone coverage map for Clinton County, IN

Zoom in for local detail. Tap or click a colored area to see coverage and signal details. On mobile, use two fingers to move the map.

Coverage Key
Less covered More covered
Darker areas mean the carrier covers more of that location.

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, © CARTO. Rendered with MapLibre. FCC BDC mobile coverage processed by Compare Wireless Carriers.

Loading coverage map...

Cell phone coverage by network in Clinton County, IN

#1

T-Mobile

Coverage Score 86.4
In Clinton County, IN
Overall
94.7%
4G LTE
94.6%
5G
84.1%
Fast 5G
57.6%
Average Signal -92 dBm
#2

AT&T

Coverage Score 86.1
In Clinton County, IN
Overall
99.9%
4G LTE
99.9%
5G
95.7%
Fast 5G
63.0%
Average Signal -111 dBm
#3

Verizon

Coverage Score 65.0
In Clinton County, IN
Overall
99.5%
4G LTE
99.5%
5G
27.0%
Fast 5G
12.9%
Average Signal -98 dBm
Sponsored US Mobile

Coverage varies by neighborhood. Your carrier shouldn’t.

US Mobile lets you switch between all three major networks, so you can choose the one that works best where you actually use your phone.

Choose your network
Dark Star Light Speed Warp 5G
Unlimited plans from
$22.50/mo
Phone + home internet bundle from
$47/mo
Shop US Mobile

Pricing, network access, switching terms, and home internet availability may vary.

Coverage by city in Clinton County, IN

Cities and towns are shown for county-level comparison. Coverage percentages use land-area only coverage.

CityVerizonAT&TT-Mobile
Antioch, IN 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -100 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 12.5% -119 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 75.0% 0.0% -103 dBm
Colfax, IN 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -92 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -110 dBm 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 20.0% -100 dBm
Forest, IN 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -100 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% -120 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 66.7% 16.7% -100 dBm
Frankfort, IN 100.0% 100.0% 88.4% 70.7% -87 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 90.0% -96 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.6% -84 dBm
Hillisburg, IN 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -100 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% -110 dBm 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm
Kirklin, IN 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 90.0% -102 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 60.0% -113 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -86 dBm
Michigantown, IN 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -72 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 66.7% -113 dBm 33.3% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm
Mulberry, IN 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -101 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 91.7% 91.7% -118 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -81 dBm
Rossville, IN 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -78 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -92 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -63 dBm
Scircleville, IN 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -108 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 75.0% -119 dBm 75.0% 75.0% 25.0% 0.0% -107 dBm
Sheridan, IN 100.0% 100.0% 84.3% 44.5% -94 dBm 99.9% 99.9% 96.4% 67.4% -111 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 99.7% 94.0% -85 dBm

About The Coverage Data

Coverage and signal estimates are derived by Compare Wireless Carriers from carrier-reported data in the FCC’s National Broadband Coverage Map, last updated in June 2025. “Percent covered” shows how much of the city or ZIP code area has a carrier signal, whether weak or strong. Signal bars show the estimated average signal strength in areas of Clinton County, IN where that carrier has coverage.

If a carrier says you should have service but you do not, run a challenge test with the FCC Mobile Speed Test App. The FCC uses those results to check carrier-submitted coverage data and requires a carrier response when enough tests show a pattern of inaccurate coverage reporting.