Coverage rankings for Rio Arriba County, NM
T-Mobile currently ranks first for coverage in this area, with a coverage score of 45.3. Compare Wireless Carriers uses FCC broadband map data to estimate and calculate coverage scores. More on that further below.
| Rank | Carrier | Score | Overall | 4G LTE | 5G | Fast 5G | Average Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | T-Mobile | 45.3 | 44.1% | 43.9% | 35.6% | 22.2% | -95 dBm |
| 2 | AT&T | 42.4 | 57.5% | 57.5% | 21.2% | 18.4% | -115 dBm |
| 3 | Verizon | 35.0 | 52.5% | 52.5% | 2.8% | 1.7% | -101 dBm |
Scores include coverage area, network type, and average signal strength.
Cell phone coverage map for Rio Arriba County, NM
Zoom in for local detail. Tap or click a colored area to see coverage and signal details. On mobile, use two fingers to move the map.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, © CARTO. Rendered with MapLibre. FCC BDC mobile coverage processed by Compare Wireless Carriers.
Loading coverage map...
Cell phone coverage by network in Rio Arriba County, NM
T-Mobile
- Overall
- 44.1%
- 4G LTE
- 43.9%
- 5G
- 35.6%
- Fast 5G
- 22.2%
AT&T
- Overall
- 57.5%
- 4G LTE
- 57.5%
- 5G
- 21.2%
- Fast 5G
- 18.4%
Verizon
- Overall
- 52.5%
- 4G LTE
- 52.5%
- 5G
- 2.8%
- Fast 5G
- 1.7%
Coverage varies by neighborhood. Your carrier shouldn’t.
US Mobile lets you switch between all three major networks, so you can choose the one that works best where you actually use your phone.
Pricing, network access, switching terms, and home internet availability may vary.
Coverage by city in Rio Arriba County, NM
Cities and towns are shown for county-level comparison. Coverage percentages use land-area only coverage.
| City | Verizon | AT&T | T-Mobile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abiquiu, NM | 57.1% 57.1% 9.5% 0.0% -108 dBm | 71.4% 71.4% 9.5% 9.5% -109 dBm | 61.9% 61.9% 42.9% 9.5% -101 dBm |
| Alcalde, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -91 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -117 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -80 dBm |
| Brazos, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -93 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -118 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -85 dBm |
| Canjilon, NM | 95.7% 95.7% 59.4% 50.7% -97 dBm | 36.2% 36.2% 0.0% 0.0% -116 dBm | 55.1% 55.1% 47.8% 18.8% -98 dBm |
| Canones, NM | 4.7% 4.7% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Canova, NM | 77.8% 77.8% 0.0% 0.0% -101 dBm | 88.9% 88.9% 0.0% 0.0% -120 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 61.1% 22.2% -102 dBm |
| Cebolla, NM | 93.9% 93.8% 29.7% 14.8% -99 dBm | 80.6% 80.6% 1.7% 1.4% -113 dBm | 89.4% 89.0% 85.4% 64.0% -92 dBm |
| Chama, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -83 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 93.7% -101 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -79 dBm |
| Chamita, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 35.3% 10.6% -92 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 98.8% 96.5% -112 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -82 dBm |
| Chili, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -87 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 27.5% 27.5% -103 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.1% -82 dBm |
| Cordova, NM | 14.3% 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm | 48.6% 48.6% 2.9% 2.9% -120 dBm | 48.6% 48.6% 31.4% 5.7% -103 dBm |
| Coyote, NM | 84.9% 84.9% 0.0% 0.0% -88 dBm | 73.3% 73.3% 0.0% 0.0% -94 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Dixon, NM | 94.2% 94.2% 0.0% 0.0% -90 dBm | 72.0% 72.0% 0.0% 0.0% -107 dBm | 28.4% 24.9% 18.7% 11.7% -97 dBm |
| Dulce, NM | 95.7% 95.7% 0.0% 0.0% -94 dBm | 88.3% 88.3% 61.9% 59.8% -114 dBm | 90.0% 90.0% 70.5% 53.7% -93 dBm |
| El Duende, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -88 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 58.1% 51.6% -104 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -86 dBm |
| El Rito, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -80 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -86 dBm | 60.4% 56.0% 58.2% 7.7% -100 dBm |
| Embudo, NM | 54.0% 54.0% 0.3% 0.2% -101 dBm | 83.0% 83.0% 1.7% 1.1% -112 dBm | 68.2% 67.9% 53.3% 31.6% -96 dBm |
| Ensenada, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -85 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 82.8% 82.8% -115 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 89.7% -85 dBm |
| Espanola, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 91.9% 84.3% -82 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 91.3% -97 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -71 dBm |
| Gallina, NM | 18.8% 18.8% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm | 10.9% 10.9% 4.3% 4.3% -120 dBm | 12.3% 12.3% 12.3% 7.2% -98 dBm |
| Hernandez, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -92 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 75.0% 63.9% -111 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.2% -83 dBm |
| La Madera, NM | 1.1% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm | 18.1% 18.1% 0.0% 0.0% -117 dBm | 12.8% 12.8% 7.4% 2.1% -103 dBm |
| La Mesilla, NM | 97.9% 97.9% 34.0% 24.5% -99 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 83.0% 4.3% -118 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 94.7% -86 dBm |
| La Villita, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -96 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 89.3% 89.3% -116 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -81 dBm |
| Lindrith, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -92 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 64.5% 63.2% -109 dBm | 75.0% 75.0% 52.6% 38.2% -97 dBm |
| Los Luceros, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -87 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 21.6% 21.6% -109 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 94.6% -84 dBm |
| Los Ojos, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -95 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 83.9% 83.9% -115 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.8% -87 dBm |
| Lumberton, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -90 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -111 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -82 dBm |
| Lybrook, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -78 dBm | 92.9% 92.9% 27.1% 25.9% -114 dBm | 98.8% 98.8% 75.3% 55.3% -93 dBm |
| Lyden, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -97 dBm | 93.8% 93.8% 29.2% 18.8% -119 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 87.5% -84 dBm |
| Medanales, NM | 92.8% 92.8% 0.0% 0.0% -102 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -97 dBm | 98.6% 98.6% 92.8% 71.0% -93 dBm |
| Ohkay Owingeh, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 83.8% 51.3% -97 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.8% -104 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -79 dBm |
| Ojo Sarco, NM | 41.1% 41.1% 0.0% 0.0% -107 dBm | 19.2% 19.2% 0.0% 0.0% -120 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Petaca, NM | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A | 20.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% -120 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Pueblito, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 16.7% 0.0% -97 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -112 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -85 dBm |
| San Jose, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 23.7% 13.2% -95 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 97.4% 36.8% -112 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -78 dBm |
| Santa Clara Pueblo, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 59.1% 52.3% -93 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 95.5% 75.0% -113 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.5% -84 dBm |
| Tierra Amarilla, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -86 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 86.0% 86.0% -116 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.2% -83 dBm |
| Truchas, NM | 24.0% 24.0% 1.3% 0.0% -110 dBm | 74.7% 74.7% 0.0% 0.0% -118 dBm | 64.3% 64.3% 51.9% 12.3% -101 dBm |
| Vallecitos, NM | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A | 21.1% 21.1% 0.0% 0.0% -119 dBm | 2.2% 2.0% 1.2% 0.0% -105 dBm |
| Velarde, NM | 84.6% 84.6% 0.0% 0.0% -102 dBm | 92.3% 92.3% 0.0% 0.0% -118 dBm | 92.3% 92.3% 82.7% 73.1% -89 dBm |
| Youngsville, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -101 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -113 dBm | 19.0% 19.0% 19.0% 4.8% -100 dBm |
| Chimayo, NM | 39.0% 39.0% 0.6% 0.0% -107 dBm | 98.3% 98.3% 5.2% 3.5% -114 dBm | 98.3% 98.3% 94.8% 90.7% -82 dBm |
| Cuartelez, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 3.4% 0.0% -95 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 93.1% 86.2% -118 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -83 dBm |
| La Jara, NM | 92.6% 91.9% 57.9% 37.9% -106 dBm | 98.7% 98.7% 0.3% 0.0% -110 dBm | 81.9% 81.9% 73.8% 52.1% -94 dBm |
| La Puebla, NM | 100.0% 100.0% 8.2% 1.6% -103 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 50.8% 47.5% -116 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 85.2% -90 dBm |
| Navajo Dam, NM | 93.8% 93.8% 28.5% 25.5% -94 dBm | 90.5% 90.5% 80.7% 69.3% -110 dBm | 55.5% 55.1% 40.9% 25.5% -97 dBm |
| Ojo Caliente, NM | 76.3% 76.3% 0.0% 0.0% -92 dBm | 84.7% 84.7% 0.0% 0.0% -106 dBm | 47.5% 47.5% 20.3% 0.0% -104 dBm |
| Regina, NM | 57.3% 56.7% 15.9% 0.0% -110 dBm | 74.5% 74.5% 0.6% 0.6% -118 dBm | 14.6% 14.6% 13.4% 5.1% -98 dBm |
| Rio Chiquito, NM | 39.1% 39.1% 0.0% 0.0% -104 dBm | 95.7% 95.7% 13.0% 8.7% -115 dBm | 91.3% 91.3% 69.6% 43.5% -96 dBm |
About The Coverage Data
Coverage and signal estimates are derived by Compare Wireless Carriers from carrier-reported data in the FCC’s National Broadband Coverage Map, last updated in June 2025. “Percent covered” shows how much of the city or ZIP code area has a carrier signal, whether weak or strong. Signal bars show the estimated average signal strength in areas of Rio Arriba County, NM where that carrier has coverage.
If a carrier says you should have service but you do not, run a challenge test with the FCC Mobile Speed Test App. The FCC uses those results to check carrier-submitted coverage data and requires a carrier response when enough tests show a pattern of inaccurate coverage reporting.