Pima County, AZ Cell Phone Coverage Map & Network Rankings (2026)

Find the best cell phone network and plan to use in Pima County, AZ

Coverage rankings for Pima County, AZ

Verizon currently ranks first for coverage in this area, with a coverage score of 50.6. Compare Wireless Carriers uses FCC broadband map data to estimate and calculate coverage scores. More on that further below.

RankCarrierScoreOverall4G LTE5GFast 5GAverage Signal
1Verizon50.665.8%65.7%23.0%18.1% -99 dBm
2AT&T46.469.9%69.8%20.3%13.2% -113 dBm
3T-Mobile43.135.3%34.7%31.8%25.7% -89 dBm

Scores include coverage area, network type, and average signal strength.

Cell phone coverage map for Pima County, AZ

Zoom in for local detail. Tap or click a colored area to see coverage and signal details. On mobile, use two fingers to move the map.

Coverage Key
Less covered More covered
Darker areas mean the carrier covers more of that location.

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, © CARTO. Rendered with MapLibre. FCC BDC mobile coverage processed by Compare Wireless Carriers.

Loading coverage map...

Cell phone coverage by network in Pima County, AZ

#1

Verizon

Coverage Score 50.6
In Pima County, AZ
Overall
65.8%
4G LTE
65.7%
5G
23.0%
Fast 5G
18.1%
Average Signal -99 dBm
#2

AT&T

Coverage Score 46.4
In Pima County, AZ
Overall
69.9%
4G LTE
69.8%
5G
20.3%
Fast 5G
13.2%
Average Signal -113 dBm
#3

T-Mobile

Coverage Score 43.1
In Pima County, AZ
Overall
35.3%
4G LTE
34.7%
5G
31.8%
Fast 5G
25.7%
Average Signal -89 dBm
Sponsored US Mobile

Coverage varies by neighborhood. Your carrier shouldn’t.

US Mobile lets you switch between all three major networks, so you can choose the one that works best where you actually use your phone.

Choose your network
Dark Star Light Speed Warp 5G
Unlimited plans from
$22.50/mo
Phone + home internet bundle from
$47/mo
Shop US Mobile

Pricing, network access, switching terms, and home internet availability may vary.

Coverage by city in Pima County, AZ

Cities and towns are shown for county-level comparison. Coverage percentages use land-area only coverage.

CityVerizonAT&TT-Mobile
Ajo, AZ 84.2% 84.2% 0.0% 0.0% -90 dBm 83.9% 83.9% 0.0% 0.0% -99 dBm 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% -100 dBm
Ak Chin, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -92 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Ali Chuk, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -65 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -91 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Ali Chukson, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -83 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -111 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Ali Molina, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -83 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -111 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Anegam, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -79 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -101 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Arivaca, AZ 90.6% 90.6% 0.0% 0.0% -89 dBm 89.2% 89.2% 0.0% 0.0% -105 dBm 85.6% 85.6% 79.7% 72.0% -84 dBm
Arivaca Junction, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 14.8% 3.3% -85 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 29.5% 29.5% -113 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -90 dBm
Avra Valley, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -86 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.4% -105 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -76 dBm
Casas Adobes, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -85 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 79.6% -102 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 99.5% 97.5% -77 dBm
Catalina, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 85.9% 79.0% -93 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 79.7% 75.5% -108 dBm 85.9% 85.9% 78.6% 62.8% -86 dBm
Catalina Foothills, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 98.9% -86 dBm 99.3% 99.3% 95.6% 58.9% -107 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 99.0% -79 dBm
Charco, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -98 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -108 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Chiawuli Tak, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -76 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -94 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Comobabi, AZ 72.2% 72.2% 0.0% 0.0% -108 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Corona de Tucson, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.2% -92 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 98.8% 72.0% -116 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.8% -78 dBm
Cowlic, AZ 5.9% 5.9% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -114 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drexel Heights, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.0% -85 dBm 96.2% 96.2% 88.8% 50.0% -107 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 99.7% 98.0% -76 dBm
Elephant Head, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 98.7% 84.6% -99 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 89.3% 81.2% -117 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -85 dBm
Flowing Wells, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -82 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 88.6% -97 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -75 dBm
Green Valley, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 98.6% 93.1% -87 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 91.4% 81.4% -109 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.0% -82 dBm
Gu Oidak, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -101 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -117 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Haivana Nakya, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -94 dBm 79.5% 79.5% 0.0% 0.0% -117 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
J-Six Ranchettes, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.0% -88 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 17.3% 17.3% -95 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 77.6% -89 dBm
Kleindale, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -80 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 75.0% -98 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -58 dBm
Ko Vaya, AZ 66.7% 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm 87.5% 87.5% 0.0% 0.0% -120 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Lukeville, AZ 50.6% 50.6% 0.0% 0.0% -100 dBm 55.3% 55.3% 0.0% 0.0% -112 dBm 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% -103 dBm
Maish Vaya, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -93 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -100 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Marana, AZ 99.3% 99.3% 95.1% 87.7% -92 dBm 98.9% 98.8% 94.5% 90.1% -106 dBm 97.9% 97.9% 95.3% 92.2% -82 dBm
Mount Lemmon, AZ 57.4% 57.1% 29.5% 17.0% -105 dBm 56.9% 56.5% 29.7% 10.8% -116 dBm 71.9% 63.5% 55.6% 38.4% -94 dBm
Nelson, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -86 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -110 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -84 dBm
Nolic, AZ 36.4% 36.4% 0.0% 0.0% -108 dBm 72.7% 72.7% 0.0% 0.0% -115 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Oro Valley, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.4% -90 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 98.5% 73.4% -103 dBm 98.8% 97.8% 92.4% 77.7% -85 dBm
Picture Rocks, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 87.6% -99 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 96.8% 80.0% -112 dBm 99.7% 99.7% 98.9% 90.8% -87 dBm
Pisinemo, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Rillito, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -100 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -107 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -70 dBm
Rincon Valley, AZ 99.8% 99.8% 94.4% 84.1% -91 dBm 98.7% 98.7% 71.8% 60.7% -111 dBm 86.0% 86.0% 82.6% 74.8% -85 dBm
Sahuarita, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -84 dBm 99.5% 99.5% 98.2% 61.0% -107 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.4% -78 dBm
San Miguel, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -93 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -108 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Santa Rosa, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -76 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -97 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sasabe, AZ 78.5% 78.5% 0.0% 0.0% -101 dBm 42.0% 42.0% 0.0% 0.0% -116 dBm 64.1% 64.1% 43.8% 29.9% -96 dBm
Sells, AZ 99.0% 99.0% 0.0% 0.0% -81 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -94 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
South Komelik, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -68 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -94 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
South Tucson, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -91 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 57.9% -103 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -77 dBm
Summerhaven, AZ 93.9% 93.9% 2.0% 0.0% -100 dBm 98.0% 93.9% 33.7% 14.3% -111 dBm 99.0% 99.0% 93.9% 88.8% -82 dBm
Summit, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -88 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 89.9% -105 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -75 dBm
Tanque Verde, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 98.8% 96.3% -91 dBm 96.7% 96.7% 87.8% 56.6% -109 dBm 99.7% 99.7% 97.8% 92.2% -82 dBm
Three Points, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 99.7% -84 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 99.7% 93.8% -105 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.5% -78 dBm
Topawa, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -97 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -87 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Tucson, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 99.7% -84 dBm 99.5% 99.4% 98.8% 68.8% -102 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 98.9% -77 dBm

About The Coverage Data

Coverage and signal estimates are derived by Compare Wireless Carriers from carrier-reported data in the FCC’s National Broadband Coverage Map, last updated in June 2025. “Percent covered” shows how much of the city or ZIP code area has a carrier signal, whether weak or strong. Signal bars show the estimated average signal strength in areas of Pima County, AZ where that carrier has coverage.

If a carrier says you should have service but you do not, run a challenge test with the FCC Mobile Speed Test App. The FCC uses those results to check carrier-submitted coverage data and requires a carrier response when enough tests show a pattern of inaccurate coverage reporting.