Coverage rankings for Pima County, AZ
Verizon currently ranks first for coverage in this area, with a coverage score of 50.6. Compare Wireless Carriers uses FCC broadband map data to estimate and calculate coverage scores. More on that further below.
| Rank | Carrier | Score | Overall | 4G LTE | 5G | Fast 5G | Average Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Verizon | 50.6 | 65.8% | 65.7% | 23.0% | 18.1% | -99 dBm |
| 2 | AT&T | 46.4 | 69.9% | 69.8% | 20.3% | 13.2% | -113 dBm |
| 3 | T-Mobile | 43.1 | 35.3% | 34.7% | 31.8% | 25.7% | -89 dBm |
Scores include coverage area, network type, and average signal strength.
Cell phone coverage map for Pima County, AZ
Zoom in for local detail. Tap or click a colored area to see coverage and signal details. On mobile, use two fingers to move the map.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, © CARTO. Rendered with MapLibre. FCC BDC mobile coverage processed by Compare Wireless Carriers.
Loading coverage map...
Cell phone coverage by network in Pima County, AZ
Verizon
- Overall
- 65.8%
- 4G LTE
- 65.7%
- 5G
- 23.0%
- Fast 5G
- 18.1%
AT&T
- Overall
- 69.9%
- 4G LTE
- 69.8%
- 5G
- 20.3%
- Fast 5G
- 13.2%
T-Mobile
- Overall
- 35.3%
- 4G LTE
- 34.7%
- 5G
- 31.8%
- Fast 5G
- 25.7%
Coverage varies by neighborhood. Your carrier shouldn’t.
US Mobile lets you switch between all three major networks, so you can choose the one that works best where you actually use your phone.
Pricing, network access, switching terms, and home internet availability may vary.
Coverage by city in Pima County, AZ
Cities and towns are shown for county-level comparison. Coverage percentages use land-area only coverage.
| City | Verizon | AT&T | T-Mobile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ajo, AZ | 84.2% 84.2% 0.0% 0.0% -90 dBm | 83.9% 83.9% 0.0% 0.0% -99 dBm | 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% -100 dBm |
| Ak Chin, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -92 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Ali Chuk, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -65 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -91 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Ali Chukson, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -83 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -111 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Ali Molina, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -83 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -111 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Anegam, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -79 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -101 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Arivaca, AZ | 90.6% 90.6% 0.0% 0.0% -89 dBm | 89.2% 89.2% 0.0% 0.0% -105 dBm | 85.6% 85.6% 79.7% 72.0% -84 dBm |
| Arivaca Junction, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 14.8% 3.3% -85 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 29.5% 29.5% -113 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -90 dBm |
| Avra Valley, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -86 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.4% -105 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -76 dBm |
| Casas Adobes, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -85 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 79.6% -102 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 99.5% 97.5% -77 dBm |
| Catalina, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 85.9% 79.0% -93 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 79.7% 75.5% -108 dBm | 85.9% 85.9% 78.6% 62.8% -86 dBm |
| Catalina Foothills, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 98.9% -86 dBm | 99.3% 99.3% 95.6% 58.9% -107 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 99.0% -79 dBm |
| Charco, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -98 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -108 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Chiawuli Tak, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -76 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -94 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Comobabi, AZ | 72.2% 72.2% 0.0% 0.0% -108 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Corona de Tucson, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.2% -92 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 98.8% 72.0% -116 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.8% -78 dBm |
| Cowlic, AZ | 5.9% 5.9% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -114 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Drexel Heights, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.0% -85 dBm | 96.2% 96.2% 88.8% 50.0% -107 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 99.7% 98.0% -76 dBm |
| Elephant Head, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 98.7% 84.6% -99 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 89.3% 81.2% -117 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -85 dBm |
| Flowing Wells, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -82 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 88.6% -97 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -75 dBm |
| Green Valley, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 98.6% 93.1% -87 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 91.4% 81.4% -109 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.0% -82 dBm |
| Gu Oidak, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -101 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -117 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Haivana Nakya, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -94 dBm | 79.5% 79.5% 0.0% 0.0% -117 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| J-Six Ranchettes, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.0% -88 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 17.3% 17.3% -95 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 77.6% -89 dBm |
| Kleindale, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -80 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 75.0% -98 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -58 dBm |
| Ko Vaya, AZ | 66.7% 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm | 87.5% 87.5% 0.0% 0.0% -120 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Lukeville, AZ | 50.6% 50.6% 0.0% 0.0% -100 dBm | 55.3% 55.3% 0.0% 0.0% -112 dBm | 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% -103 dBm |
| Maish Vaya, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -93 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -100 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Marana, AZ | 99.3% 99.3% 95.1% 87.7% -92 dBm | 98.9% 98.8% 94.5% 90.1% -106 dBm | 97.9% 97.9% 95.3% 92.2% -82 dBm |
| Mount Lemmon, AZ | 57.4% 57.1% 29.5% 17.0% -105 dBm | 56.9% 56.5% 29.7% 10.8% -116 dBm | 71.9% 63.5% 55.6% 38.4% -94 dBm |
| Nelson, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -86 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -110 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -84 dBm |
| Nolic, AZ | 36.4% 36.4% 0.0% 0.0% -108 dBm | 72.7% 72.7% 0.0% 0.0% -115 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Oro Valley, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.4% -90 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 98.5% 73.4% -103 dBm | 98.8% 97.8% 92.4% 77.7% -85 dBm |
| Picture Rocks, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 87.6% -99 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 96.8% 80.0% -112 dBm | 99.7% 99.7% 98.9% 90.8% -87 dBm |
| Pisinemo, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Rillito, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -100 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -107 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -70 dBm |
| Rincon Valley, AZ | 99.8% 99.8% 94.4% 84.1% -91 dBm | 98.7% 98.7% 71.8% 60.7% -111 dBm | 86.0% 86.0% 82.6% 74.8% -85 dBm |
| Sahuarita, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -84 dBm | 99.5% 99.5% 98.2% 61.0% -107 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.4% -78 dBm |
| San Miguel, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -93 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -108 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Santa Rosa, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -76 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -97 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Sasabe, AZ | 78.5% 78.5% 0.0% 0.0% -101 dBm | 42.0% 42.0% 0.0% 0.0% -116 dBm | 64.1% 64.1% 43.8% 29.9% -96 dBm |
| Sells, AZ | 99.0% 99.0% 0.0% 0.0% -81 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -94 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| South Komelik, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -68 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -94 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| South Tucson, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -91 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 57.9% -103 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -77 dBm |
| Summerhaven, AZ | 93.9% 93.9% 2.0% 0.0% -100 dBm | 98.0% 93.9% 33.7% 14.3% -111 dBm | 99.0% 99.0% 93.9% 88.8% -82 dBm |
| Summit, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -88 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 89.9% -105 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -75 dBm |
| Tanque Verde, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 98.8% 96.3% -91 dBm | 96.7% 96.7% 87.8% 56.6% -109 dBm | 99.7% 99.7% 97.8% 92.2% -82 dBm |
| Three Points, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 99.7% -84 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 99.7% 93.8% -105 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.5% -78 dBm |
| Topawa, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -97 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -87 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Tucson, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 99.7% -84 dBm | 99.5% 99.4% 98.8% 68.8% -102 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 98.9% -77 dBm |
About The Coverage Data
Coverage and signal estimates are derived by Compare Wireless Carriers from carrier-reported data in the FCC’s National Broadband Coverage Map, last updated in June 2025. “Percent covered” shows how much of the city or ZIP code area has a carrier signal, whether weak or strong. Signal bars show the estimated average signal strength in areas of Pima County, AZ where that carrier has coverage.
If a carrier says you should have service but you do not, run a challenge test with the FCC Mobile Speed Test App. The FCC uses those results to check carrier-submitted coverage data and requires a carrier response when enough tests show a pattern of inaccurate coverage reporting.