Neosho County, KS Cell Phone Coverage Map & Network Rankings (2026)

Find the best cell phone network and plan to use in Neosho County, KS

Coverage rankings for Neosho County, KS

Verizon currently ranks first for coverage in this area, with a coverage score of 78.5. Compare Wireless Carriers uses FCC broadband map data to estimate and calculate coverage scores. More on that further below.

RankCarrierScoreOverall4G LTE5GFast 5GAverage Signal
1Verizon78.599.9%99.9%63.2%33.0% -95 dBm
2T-Mobile77.685.4%85.4%72.2%46.6% -94 dBm
3AT&T54.093.2%93.2%11.4%8.1% -112 dBm

Scores include coverage area, network type, and average signal strength.

Cell phone coverage map for Neosho County, KS

Zoom in for local detail. Tap or click a colored area to see coverage and signal details. On mobile, use two fingers to move the map.

Coverage Key
Less covered More covered
Darker areas mean the carrier covers more of that location.

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, © CARTO. Rendered with MapLibre. FCC BDC mobile coverage processed by Compare Wireless Carriers.

Loading coverage map...

Cell phone coverage by network in Neosho County, KS

#1

Verizon

Coverage Score 78.5
In Neosho County, KS
Overall
99.9%
4G LTE
99.9%
5G
63.2%
Fast 5G
33.0%
Average Signal -95 dBm
#2

T-Mobile

Coverage Score 77.6
In Neosho County, KS
Overall
85.4%
4G LTE
85.4%
5G
72.2%
Fast 5G
46.6%
Average Signal -94 dBm
#3

AT&T

Coverage Score 54.0
In Neosho County, KS
Overall
93.2%
4G LTE
93.2%
5G
11.4%
Fast 5G
8.1%
Average Signal -112 dBm
Sponsored US Mobile

Coverage varies by neighborhood. Your carrier shouldn’t.

US Mobile lets you switch between all three major networks, so you can choose the one that works best where you actually use your phone.

Choose your network
Dark Star Light Speed Warp 5G
Unlimited plans from
$22.50/mo
Phone + home internet bundle from
$47/mo
Shop US Mobile

Pricing, network access, switching terms, and home internet availability may vary.

Coverage by city in Neosho County, KS

Cities and towns are shown for county-level comparison. Coverage percentages use land-area only coverage.

CityVerizonAT&TT-Mobile
Chanute, KS 100.0% 100.0% 91.9% 78.9% -85 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -96 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 99.4% 96.3% -82 dBm
Earlton, KS 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% -100 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm 50.0% 50.0% 25.0% 0.0% -100 dBm
Erie, KS 100.0% 100.0% 83.3% 16.7% -99 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -102 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 93.3% -89 dBm
Galesburg, KS 100.0% 100.0% 75.0% 0.0% -100 dBm 75.0% 75.0% 0.0% 0.0% -120 dBm 75.0% 75.0% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm
Saint Paul, KS 100.0% 100.0% 18.6% 0.7% -94 dBm 96.0% 96.0% 2.9% 1.5% -112 dBm 95.3% 95.3% 86.4% 60.2% -93 dBm
South Mound, KS 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 87.0% -91 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 60.9% 47.8% -112 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 95.7% 52.2% -97 dBm
St. Paul, KS 100.0% 100.0% 4.0% 0.0% -88 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -106 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 92.0% -90 dBm
Stark, KS 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -100 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% -95 dBm
Thayer, KS 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -76 dBm 92.3% 92.3% 69.2% 53.8% -120 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Urbana, KS 100.0% 100.0% 66.7% 0.0% -99 dBm 89.7% 89.7% 0.0% 0.0% -119 dBm 43.6% 43.6% 28.2% 0.0% -103 dBm
Parsons, KS 100.0% 100.0% 86.6% 83.8% -87 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 98.8% 97.2% -100 dBm 99.6% 99.6% 98.8% 91.1% -81 dBm
Walnut, KS 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -96 dBm 30.3% 30.3% 0.0% 0.0% -120 dBm 39.4% 39.4% 9.1% 0.0% -108 dBm

About The Coverage Data

Coverage and signal estimates are derived by Compare Wireless Carriers from carrier-reported data in the FCC’s National Broadband Coverage Map, last updated in June 2025. “Percent covered” shows how much of the city or ZIP code area has a carrier signal, whether weak or strong. Signal bars show the estimated average signal strength in areas of Neosho County, KS where that carrier has coverage.

If a carrier says you should have service but you do not, run a challenge test with the FCC Mobile Speed Test App. The FCC uses those results to check carrier-submitted coverage data and requires a carrier response when enough tests show a pattern of inaccurate coverage reporting.