Charles County, MD Cell Phone Coverage Map & Network Rankings (2026)

Find the best cell phone network and plan to use in Charles County, MD

Coverage rankings for Charles County, MD

T-Mobile currently ranks first for coverage in this area, with a coverage score of 79.7. Compare Wireless Carriers uses FCC broadband map data to estimate and calculate coverage scores. More on that further below.

RankCarrierScoreOverall4G LTE5GFast 5GAverage Signal
1T-Mobile79.782.8%82.5%76.9%54.5% -91 dBm
2AT&T77.396.1%94.8%74.9%45.5% -113 dBm
3Verizon62.495.0%95.0%22.0%12.9% -97 dBm

Scores include coverage area, network type, and average signal strength.

Cell phone coverage map for Charles County, MD

Zoom in for local detail. Tap or click a colored area to see coverage and signal details. On mobile, use two fingers to move the map.

Coverage Key
Less covered More covered
Darker areas mean the carrier covers more of that location.

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, © CARTO. Rendered with MapLibre. FCC BDC mobile coverage processed by Compare Wireless Carriers.

Loading coverage map...

Cell phone coverage by network in Charles County, MD

#1

T-Mobile

Coverage Score 79.7
In Charles County, MD
Overall
82.8%
4G LTE
82.5%
5G
76.9%
Fast 5G
54.5%
Average Signal -91 dBm
#2

AT&T

Coverage Score 77.3
In Charles County, MD
Overall
96.1%
4G LTE
94.8%
5G
74.9%
Fast 5G
45.5%
Average Signal -113 dBm
#3

Verizon

Coverage Score 62.4
In Charles County, MD
Overall
95.0%
4G LTE
95.0%
5G
22.0%
Fast 5G
12.9%
Average Signal -97 dBm
Sponsored US Mobile

Coverage varies by neighborhood. Your carrier shouldn’t.

US Mobile lets you switch between all three major networks, so you can choose the one that works best where you actually use your phone.

Choose your network
Dark Star Light Speed Warp 5G
Unlimited plans from
$22.50/mo
Phone + home internet bundle from
$47/mo
Shop US Mobile

Pricing, network access, switching terms, and home internet availability may vary.

Coverage by city in Charles County, MD

Cities and towns are shown for county-level comparison. Coverage percentages use land-area only coverage.

CityVerizonAT&TT-Mobile
Bel Alton, MD 99.0% 99.0% 2.4% 0.5% -96 dBm 98.1% 98.1% 85.7% 47.6% -114 dBm 98.6% 98.6% 97.6% 85.7% -88 dBm
Benedict, MD 100.0% 100.0% 16.7% 0.0% -95 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 33.3% -108 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% -95 dBm
Bensville, MD 98.4% 98.4% 39.3% 23.8% -96 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 77.6% 45.0% -114 dBm 92.8% 92.8% 89.1% 64.7% -90 dBm
Bryans Road, MD 90.1% 90.1% 9.7% 5.6% -95 dBm 99.7% 99.7% 89.1% 67.9% -110 dBm 98.5% 96.9% 98.0% 79.6% -88 dBm
Bryantown, MD 100.0% 100.0% 43.9% 29.0% -93 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 82.2% 53.3% -117 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 99.1% 80.4% -87 dBm
Cobb Island, MD 100.0% 100.0% 23.5% 0.0% -104 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -101 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -80 dBm
Faulkner, MD 100.0% 100.0% 13.4% 3.0% -95 dBm 99.4% 99.4% 98.8% 82.3% -104 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 89.6% -84 dBm
Hughesville, MD 100.0% 100.0% 9.4% 3.5% -93 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 99.7% 65.7% -108 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 85.7% -89 dBm
Indian Head, MD 100.0% 100.0% 66.7% 40.0% -90 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 73.3% -102 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -84 dBm
Issue, MD 89.3% 89.3% 5.5% 0.3% -97 dBm 89.9% 89.9% 56.5% 32.1% -115 dBm 74.2% 74.2% 63.9% 41.0% -94 dBm
La Plata, MD 100.0% 100.0% 72.1% 54.7% -89 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 99.0% 83.1% -100 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.0% -82 dBm
Marbury, MD 100.0% 100.0% 7.1% 3.5% -89 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 94.7% 40.7% -113 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 77.9% -93 dBm
Nanjemoy, MD 85.9% 85.9% 0.5% 0.1% -98 dBm 94.0% 93.8% 68.7% 41.9% -115 dBm 42.0% 42.0% 36.5% 21.9% -96 dBm
Newburg, MD 89.3% 89.3% 5.5% 0.3% -97 dBm 89.9% 89.9% 56.5% 32.1% -115 dBm 74.2% 74.2% 63.9% 41.0% -94 dBm
Pomfret, MD 98.6% 98.6% 2.9% 1.4% -96 dBm 95.7% 95.7% 49.3% 20.3% -113 dBm 76.8% 76.8% 68.1% 30.4% -95 dBm
Port Tobacco, MD 94.0% 94.0% 6.8% 2.5% -98 dBm 98.2% 97.2% 93.2% 46.9% -112 dBm 76.1% 75.1% 64.5% 22.2% -100 dBm
Port Tobacco Village, MD 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -100 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 25.0% -110 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% -100 dBm
Potomac Heights, MD 100.0% 100.0% 59.3% 22.2% -94 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 70.4% -106 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -84 dBm
Rock Point, MD 82.4% 82.4% 5.9% 0.0% -104 dBm 94.1% 94.1% 94.1% 76.5% -99 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -76 dBm
Waldorf, MD 100.0% 100.0% 65.6% 46.5% -91 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 99.0% 88.6% -105 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 96.4% 88.5% -83 dBm
Welcome, MD 78.5% 78.5% 11.2% 5.0% -102 dBm 78.9% 78.7% 47.5% 15.5% -117 dBm 56.4% 56.4% 48.1% 28.5% -96 dBm
White Plains, MD 98.1% 98.1% 43.4% 25.3% -93 dBm 99.5% 99.5% 87.4% 67.3% -109 dBm 94.8% 94.8% 91.5% 75.8% -88 dBm
Accokeek, MD 98.3% 98.3% 33.9% 18.0% -98 dBm 99.7% 99.7% 85.3% 57.8% -112 dBm 98.1% 97.0% 94.8% 80.5% -88 dBm
Aquasco, MD 99.4% 99.4% 7.7% 4.3% -98 dBm 95.3% 95.3% 54.0% 35.5% -117 dBm 97.0% 97.0% 90.3% 55.4% -93 dBm
Baden, MD 99.4% 99.4% 5.3% 3.0% -98 dBm 98.1% 98.0% 62.9% 26.8% -116 dBm 95.6% 95.1% 92.4% 69.7% -91 dBm
Brandywine, MD 96.3% 96.3% 40.9% 25.1% -98 dBm 100.0% 99.1% 97.6% 75.7% -107 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 95.4% 84.6% -86 dBm
Cedarville, MD 100.0% 100.0% 23.7% 14.8% -100 dBm 100.0% 99.1% 56.7% 42.7% -110 dBm 99.7% 99.7% 98.2% 73.9% -90 dBm
Charlotte Hall, MD 100.0% 100.0% 46.6% 12.2% -98 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 86.3% 61.8% -114 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 97.7% 83.2% -87 dBm
Golden Beach, MD 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -88 dBm 97.9% 97.9% 58.8% 16.5% -119 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 95.9% 75.3% -90 dBm

About The Coverage Data

Coverage and signal estimates are derived by Compare Wireless Carriers from carrier-reported data in the FCC’s National Broadband Coverage Map, last updated in June 2025. “Percent covered” shows how much of the city or ZIP code area has a carrier signal, whether weak or strong. Signal bars show the estimated average signal strength in areas of Charles County, MD where that carrier has coverage.

If a carrier says you should have service but you do not, run a challenge test with the FCC Mobile Speed Test App. The FCC uses those results to check carrier-submitted coverage data and requires a carrier response when enough tests show a pattern of inaccurate coverage reporting.