Coverage rankings for Cache County, UT
T-Mobile currently ranks first for coverage in this area, with a coverage score of 59.1. Compare Wireless Carriers uses FCC broadband map data to estimate and calculate coverage scores. More on that further below.
| Rank | Carrier | Score | Overall | 4G LTE | 5G | Fast 5G | Average Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | T-Mobile | 59.1 | 51.8% | 51.2% | 49.7% | 42.8% | -88 dBm |
| 2 | Verizon | 48.5 | 55.3% | 55.0% | 33.7% | 18.3% | -96 dBm |
| 3 | AT&T | 46.5 | 49.4% | 49.4% | 42.0% | 25.4% | -108 dBm |
Scores include coverage area, network type, and average signal strength.
Cell phone coverage map for Cache County, UT
Zoom in for local detail. Tap or click a colored area to see coverage and signal details. On mobile, use two fingers to move the map.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, © CARTO. Rendered with MapLibre. FCC BDC mobile coverage processed by Compare Wireless Carriers.
Loading coverage map...
Cell phone coverage by network in Cache County, UT
T-Mobile
- Overall
- 51.8%
- 4G LTE
- 51.2%
- 5G
- 49.7%
- Fast 5G
- 42.8%
Verizon
- Overall
- 55.3%
- 4G LTE
- 55.0%
- 5G
- 33.7%
- Fast 5G
- 18.3%
AT&T
- Overall
- 49.4%
- 4G LTE
- 49.4%
- 5G
- 42.0%
- Fast 5G
- 25.4%
Coverage varies by neighborhood. Your carrier shouldn’t.
US Mobile lets you switch between all three major networks, so you can choose the one that works best where you actually use your phone.
Pricing, network access, switching terms, and home internet availability may vary.
Coverage by city in Cache County, UT
Cities and towns are shown for county-level comparison. Coverage percentages use land-area only coverage.
| City | Verizon | AT&T | T-Mobile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amalga, UT | 100.0% 100.0% 81.5% 17.3% -96 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 48.1% -109 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.5% -87 dBm |
| Avon, UT | 100.0% 100.0% 58.3% 39.9% -89 dBm | 67.5% 67.5% 43.6% 32.5% -116 dBm | 93.3% 93.3% 90.2% 79.8% -90 dBm |
| Benson, UT | 100.0% 100.0% 99.6% 84.8% -91 dBm | 99.7% 99.7% 99.0% 10.6% -106 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -85 dBm |
| Cache, UT | 100.0% 100.0% 45.9% 3.8% -87 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 66.2% -98 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.2% -77 dBm |
| Cache Junction, UT | 100.0% 100.0% 53.9% 3.9% -87 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 58.8% -97 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -76 dBm |
| Clarkston, UT | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -70 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 85.7% -111 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 90.5% -88 dBm |
| Cornish, UT | 100.0% 100.0% 93.9% 0.8% -100 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 97.7% 93.9% -112 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 99.2% 94.7% -90 dBm |
| Cove, UT | 96.3% 96.3% 41.5% 10.6% -101 dBm | 98.0% 98.0% 91.1% 83.1% -106 dBm | 95.7% 94.6% 92.8% 81.9% -85 dBm |
| Hyde Park, UT | 100.0% 100.0% 98.3% 94.0% -88 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 98.3% 56.4% -100 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.4% -84 dBm |
| Hyrum, UT | 100.0% 100.0% 94.4% 72.5% -87 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 97.2% 85.9% -105 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 98.6% 96.5% -84 dBm |
| Lewiston, UT | 100.0% 100.0% 90.7% 40.6% -96 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 99.5% 84.3% -103 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.5% -83 dBm |
| Logan, UT | 100.0% 100.0% 99.8% 91.0% -83 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 99.8% 70.3% -93 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.5% -80 dBm |
| Mendon, UT | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.4% -81 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% -109 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 94.9% -92 dBm |
| Millville, UT | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 94.6% -85 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 83.9% -93 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.4% -89 dBm |
| Newton, UT | 100.0% 100.0% 68.2% 0.0% -95 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 90.9% -105 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -83 dBm |
| Nibley, UT | 100.0% 100.0% 96.4% 86.4% -85 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 61.8% -100 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 94.5% -89 dBm |
| North Logan, UT | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.2% -87 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 99.4% 49.7% -94 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -82 dBm |
| Paradise, UT | 100.0% 100.0% 97.0% 93.9% -92 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 87.9% -102 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -82 dBm |
| Peter, UT | 100.0% 100.0% 89.2% 47.8% -93 dBm | 99.8% 99.8% 98.8% 28.3% -108 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 99.8% 98.8% -85 dBm |
| Providence, UT | 100.0% 100.0% 99.0% 87.8% -87 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 68.4% -98 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.0% -83 dBm |
| Richmond, UT | 100.0% 100.0% 85.5% 0.0% -98 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -93 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -80 dBm |
| River Heights, UT | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 62.5% -93 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 93.8% 37.5% -104 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -88 dBm |
| Smithfield, UT | 100.0% 100.0% 99.3% 85.7% -89 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 99.3% 80.0% -99 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -81 dBm |
| Trenton, UT | 100.0% 100.0% 74.7% 0.0% -98 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 59.8% -111 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.4% -91 dBm |
| Wellsville, UT | 100.0% 100.0% 74.0% 61.6% -86 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 72.9% 55.9% -98 dBm | 98.3% 97.7% 97.7% 95.5% -78 dBm |
| Garden, UT | 94.1% 94.1% 70.4% 47.3% -97 dBm | 85.4% 85.4% 67.7% 66.6% -112 dBm | 69.5% 69.1% 64.3% 47.9% -92 dBm |
About The Coverage Data
Coverage and signal estimates are derived by Compare Wireless Carriers from carrier-reported data in the FCC’s National Broadband Coverage Map, last updated in June 2025. “Percent covered” shows how much of the city or ZIP code area has a carrier signal, whether weak or strong. Signal bars show the estimated average signal strength in areas of Cache County, UT where that carrier has coverage.
If a carrier says you should have service but you do not, run a challenge test with the FCC Mobile Speed Test App. The FCC uses those results to check carrier-submitted coverage data and requires a carrier response when enough tests show a pattern of inaccurate coverage reporting.