Verizon currently ranks first for coverage in this area, with a coverage score of 48.4. Compare Wireless Carriers uses FCC broadband map data to estimate and calculate coverage scores. More on that further below.Coverage rankings for Vermont
| Rank | Carrier | Score | Overall | 4G LTE | 5G | Fast 5G | Average Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Verizon | 48.4 | 77.3% | 77.3% | 7.6% | 3.6% | -98 dBm |
| 2 | AT&T | 41.2 | 65.4% | 65.3% | 11.9% | 8.5% | -114 dBm |
| 3 | T-Mobile | 40.7 | 40.0% | 39.9% | 30.6% | 17.4% | -96 dBm |
Scores include coverage area, network type, and average signal strength.
Cell phone coverage map for Vermont
Zoom in for local detail. Tap or click a colored area to see coverage and signal details. On mobile, use two fingers to move the map.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, © CARTO. Rendered with MapLibre. FCC BDC mobile coverage processed by Compare Wireless Carriers.
Loading coverage map...
Cell phone coverage by network in Vermont
Verizon
- Overall
- 77.3%
- 4G LTE
- 77.3%
- 5G
- 7.6%
- Fast 5G
- 3.6%
AT&T
- Overall
- 65.4%
- 4G LTE
- 65.3%
- 5G
- 11.9%
- Fast 5G
- 8.5%
T-Mobile
- Overall
- 40.0%
- 4G LTE
- 39.9%
- 5G
- 30.6%
- Fast 5G
- 17.4%
Coverage varies by neighborhood. Your carrier shouldn’t.
US Mobile lets you switch between all three major networks, so you can choose the one that works best where you actually use your phone.
Pricing, network access, switching terms, and home internet availability may vary.
Coverage by county in Vermont
Counties are shown for statewide comparison. Coverage percentages use land-area only coverage.
| County | Verizon | AT&T | T-Mobile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Addison County, VT | 80.1% 80.1% 12.6% 6.4% -97 dBm | 74.7% 74.7% 12.6% 10.2% -114 dBm | 35.9% 35.9% 28.2% 15.8% -96 dBm |
| Bennington County, VT | 76.5% 76.5% 10.9% 5.1% -97 dBm | 71.9% 71.8% 18.4% 12.7% -113 dBm | 49.0% 49.0% 34.5% 19.1% -97 dBm |
| Caledonia County, VT | 83.0% 83.0% 9.0% 4.4% -99 dBm | 68.2% 68.2% 8.3% 6.0% -114 dBm | 40.3% 40.0% 34.3% 19.6% -95 dBm |
| Chittenden County, VT | 95.3% 95.3% 13.9% 7.5% -95 dBm | 86.3% 86.3% 14.2% 11.1% -111 dBm | 64.2% 64.2% 52.3% 33.0% -94 dBm |
| Essex County, VT | 64.5% 64.5% 2.6% 1.3% -101 dBm | 49.8% 49.8% 6.0% 5.7% -115 dBm | 31.9% 31.8% 24.8% 11.9% -98 dBm |
| Franklin County, VT | 72.4% 72.4% 4.8% 2.7% -101 dBm | 61.6% 61.6% 16.7% 12.1% -116 dBm | 31.3% 31.3% 23.0% 13.6% -96 dBm |
| Grand Isle County, VT | 93.0% 93.0% 8.6% 3.3% -97 dBm | 85.2% 85.2% 10.3% 7.0% -114 dBm | 27.4% 27.4% 15.9% 5.6% -102 dBm |
| Lamoille County, VT | 76.3% 76.3% 6.6% 2.1% -96 dBm | 54.7% 54.7% 0.4% 0.2% -113 dBm | 27.3% 27.2% 22.2% 12.6% -96 dBm |
| Orange County, VT | 66.7% 66.7% 6.2% 3.2% -97 dBm | 63.8% 63.8% 11.2% 8.6% -113 dBm | 36.6% 36.6% 28.3% 16.7% -96 dBm |
| Orleans County, VT | 70.3% 70.3% 3.0% 1.4% -99 dBm | 51.4% 51.4% 8.6% 6.9% -114 dBm | 35.2% 35.2% 27.5% 16.3% -96 dBm |
| Rutland County, VT | 77.6% 77.6% 11.2% 5.3% -98 dBm | 66.5% 66.4% 19.5% 11.0% -113 dBm | 38.3% 38.3% 29.3% 17.1% -96 dBm |
| Washington County, VT | 81.1% 81.1% 2.6% 1.1% -95 dBm | 66.3% 66.2% 14.0% 7.5% -113 dBm | 43.9% 43.9% 33.7% 19.3% -96 dBm |
| Windham County, VT | 75.9% 75.9% 6.2% 2.5% -98 dBm | 70.5% 70.5% 8.9% 8.1% -113 dBm | 44.9% 44.9% 31.3% 15.6% -98 dBm |
| Windsor County, VT | 83.4% 83.4% 8.3% 3.7% -98 dBm | 61.3% 61.2% 11.2% 8.2% -113 dBm | 42.3% 42.2% 32.0% 18.1% -97 dBm |
About The Coverage Data
Coverage and signal estimates are derived by Compare Wireless Carriers from carrier-reported data in the FCC’s National Broadband Coverage Map, last updated in June 2025. “Percent covered” shows how much of the city or ZIP code area has a carrier signal, whether weak or strong. Signal bars show the estimated average signal strength in areas of Vermont where that carrier has coverage.
If a carrier says you should have service but you do not, run a challenge test with the FCC Mobile Speed Test App. The FCC uses those results to check carrier-submitted coverage data and requires a carrier response when enough tests show a pattern of inaccurate coverage reporting.